Menu

Court Report

Explaining the Freddie Gray case

The ongoing story of the prosecutions of police officers in Baltimore arising from the death in custody of Freddie Gray includes a ruling, which is being followed in the current trial of a second officer, compelling Officer Porter to testify against the remaining police officers. Last week the Court of Appeals’ opinion was issued explaining this ruling and the law in Maryland regarding a person’s right under the Fifth Amendment not to be compelled to testify in another case while charges against the witness from the same matter are pending.

Read more...

Dueling restaurants and zoning

Competition among restaurants can be fierce, and it is not unusual to see a restaurant owner use legal arguments to try to keep a competitor out of what the first owner believes is its territory. This is illustrated in one of my favorite names for a case this year came that came down recently from Maryland’s Court of Appeals, called A Guy Named Moe, LLC v. Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC.

Read more...

Another "Birther" bites the dust

There have been a number of lawsuits filed by persons referred to in the press and media as “birthers,” who allege that President Obama was not born in the United States and is therefore ineligible under the U.S. Constitution to be President. While the President’s second term is approaching its end, last week the Maryland Court of Special Appeals addressed such a suit, in a case called Montgomery Blair Sibley v. John Doe.

Read more...

Consider a case of reasonable force

There has been much publicity in recent years about shootings by police officers.  The law tries to balance the difficult job of an officer, often in the heat of the moment, with the laws that protect all persons including criminal suspects. How a jury and the courts resolve such cases is illustrated by a case last month from Maryland’s intermediate appellate Court called Johnnie Armstead Riley v. State.

Read more...

The flexibility of a charter school

In recognition of a national movement to create public charter schools, Maryland passed the Public Charter Schools Act of 2003. The Act provides that funding for these schools is to be “commensurate with the amount disbursed to other public schools in the local jurisdiction.” While the details of public school funding are within the purview of local school boards and the State board, sometimes the Courts are asked to resolve disputes as illustrated by a recent case from Maryland’s Court of Special Appeals in a case called Frederick Classical Charter v. Frederick County Board of Education.

Read more...

Marijuana is still considered illegal

In 2014 the Maryland General Assembly changed Maryland law as to the penalties that can be imposed for possession of marijuana, so that possession of less than 10 grams is now considered a civil offense punishable by a fine and not a criminal defense. Whether this change in the law affects searches and seizures in Maryland was explored in an opinion last month from Maryland’s Court of Special Appeals in a case called Joshua Bowling v. State.

Read more...

Employer retaliation and lawsuits

In addition to federal laws addressing claims for discrimination based on such characteristics as race, sex, age, or national origin, the Montgomery County Code addresses such claims. Section 27-19 (c) prohibits a person from retaliating against an individual for lawfully opposing a discriminatory practice or filing a complaint alleging such discrimination. The type of evidence needed to prove such a claim was explored in an opinion from Maryland’s intermediate appellate Court last month called Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Balderrama.

Read more...

Fun with wiretaps and other things

Maryland has a Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act, which regulates the interception or recording of wire, oral and electronic communications. Maryland law is even stricter than federal wiretapping statutes, because generally in Maryland both parties to a communication such as a telephone call must consent to the communication being recorded in order to be legal. One exception to this requirement involves the supervision of law enforcement over recording of call, as explored by Maryland’s highest Court in an opinion just filed by the Court of Appeals in a case called David Glenn Seal v. State of Maryland.

Read more...

Custody struggles in a global village

In this day and age when world travel and multinational citizenship is so common, courts are ever more frequently called upon to wrestle with which court has jurisdiction to resolve disputes over basic issues such as family law. The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) has been adopted in Maryland and most other states to address the problem of child custody jurisdiction, and directs that the court in a child’s “home state” has the power to handle initial custody decisions. Sometimes courts have to work through complex facts just to determine which state is home for a child, as illustrated by a recent case from Maryland’s intermediate appellate court called Garba v.Ndiaye.

Read more...

Public information and abortion clinics

The Maryland Public Information Act (PIA), similar to the federal Freedom of Information Act, broadly provides a means for members of the public to obtain government documents which may shed light upon the actions of the government. Public policy under the PIA is strongly in favor of disclosure of government records. How that policy should be interpreted when it comes to controversial documents such as records of ownership of abortion clinics was explored in a case last month from Maryland’s highest court called Andrew Glenn v. Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene (DHMH).

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed